I heard on the radio a while back someone promoting a
book about poverty, arguing that the standards that determine the poverty level
have to do with whether you have enough to buy potatoes and really should be
changed to include more “social” than “survival” criteria. The author quoted Adam Smith saying that, in
his day, a man “would be ashamed to be seen in public without a linen shirt,”
but noting that even the Roman emperors would not have had such a thing; and
the author went on then to say that our current standards of poverty should ask
questions like, “would you be ashamed to be seen in public—“ at which point my
attention dissolved in complete wonder on a question that I’ve pondered many
times in the past decade or so—IS there even shame anymore? Is there ANYthing that our culture would
actually consider “shameful,” or that would make somebody feel “shamed” or
“ashamed?”
I mean, I expect that individual people might feel
ashamed about certain very personal things—many women, for example, are ashamed
of various aspects of their bodies (generally, they feel that parts or all of
their bodies are “too fat,” and want to hide these things, or their entire
bodies, if and when they can), but something external to you, that you could buy
and wear or have with you, or not have with you—or even a BEHAVIOR you might
engage in, in public—is there anything, really, anymore, in the U.S., that
could be said would (or SHOULD) make somebody feel ashamed—or even just
EMBARRASSED?
The author on the radio seemed to be implying that
people would be ashamed if they didn’t have a cellphone, or some kind of paid
TV plan. I (shamelessly!) don’t have
either of those, but I’ll admit I’m on the fringe there. Would other people, though, really be ASHAMED
if they didn’t have a cellphone, or cable (or other expensive) TV? Or would they just feel deprived of something
they wanted; would they just feel ENVIOUS of others who had those things? Shame is definitely NOT the same thing as
envy. . .
I saw a woman last winter while I was out shopping. She was waiting at a counter to buy
something, a fully grown adult woman mind you, wearing footie pyjamas. Bright royal blue, with bright cutesy designs
on them. Not a snow suit. Fleece footie pyjamas. Maybe that was the warmest thing she had to
wear on quite a cold day. But I would
have been crippled with embarrassment, had somebody (or the situation) forced
me to go out in public and try to function in such a get-up. She seemed utterly comfortable; just hangin’
out at the counter waiting for her turn.
My question to you, dear reader: IS there shame in our culture today, or have
we killed it? If we have, is that
okay? Or would it be better for that
woman to be embarrassed, out in public in her footie jammies, if that also meant that our culture’s
boundaries of acceptable behavior on other fronts could be more tightly drawn
than they are today?
IS there shame?
If not, do you miss it? If so,
are you a fan of it?
Here's another take on the topic of shamelessness:
so-a-gay-stripper-walks-into-a-top-childrens-charity-and-asks-for-a-job
so-a-gay-stripper-walks-into-a-top-childrens-charity-and-asks-for-a-job
No comments:
Post a Comment